Florence Pugh's Cathy Ames Makes Steinbeck's Monster Human
Netflix's 'East of Eden,' written by Zoe Kazan and starring Florence Pugh, reframes Cathy Ames as a human being — and Steinbeck purists aren't happy about it.

Programme
- Netflix is adapting John Steinbeck's 1952 novel East of Eden as a series.
- Florence Pugh plays Cathy Ames, the novel's central villain.
- Zoe Kazan writes the adaptation; she is Steinbeck's granddaughter.
- The show's humanized take on Cathy has rankled Steinbeck purists.
Netflix's forthcoming series East of Eden gives Cathy Ames something she never had in John Steinbeck's 1952 novel: a recognizably human inner life. Florence Pugh plays her. Zoe Kazan, the screenwriter whose grandfather John Steinbeck wrote the source novel, shapes the take.
That choice has already divided readers. Steinbeck purists, by the account accompanying the show, are rankled. Their objection is specific: the adaptation makes a villain into a human being.
Why the villain was never just a character
Cathy Ames is one of American literature's coldest creations. Steinbeck wrote her as near-embodiment of evil — manipulative, cruel, opaque. Readers have treated that opacity as the point for seven decades.
Kazan and Pugh reverse the mechanism. Instead of a figure who acts without explanation, this Cathy gets motivation, interiority, a psychology you can follow. The showrunners' bet, as reported, is that a nuanced villain reads as more truthful than an allegorical one.
What does this change for viewers who loved the book? Mostly the terms of the argument. The plot beats can stay; what shifts is whether Cathy reads as a person making choices or as a force moving through them.
A family affair, twice over
Kazan's connection is literal. She is Steinbeck's granddaughter, and East of Eden is a novel about inheritance — the Trask family passing damage down a generation. A screenwriter adapting her grandfather's most famous book about familial legacy carries an obvious interpretive weight, whether she leans on it or not.
Pugh, for her part, has built a career on characters who are difficult to like but hard to look away from. That resume makes her casting itself an editorial statement about how this Cathy should land.
The adaptation argument, plainly stated
Fidelity disputes usually come down to one question: is a character's function in the book the same as their function on screen? In prose, Cathy can operate as an idea. Steinbeck could tell you she was evil, and the narrator's authority held.
Television works differently. A performer occupies the frame for hours. Pugh's face does things a narrated paragraph can't — and once the audience watches a person think, allegory gets harder to sustain. Kazan's script, per the report, leans into that rather than fighting it.
The purists' counterargument has force too. Soften Cathy, and you soften the novel's moral architecture. East of Eden stages a struggle between good and evil in a way that depends on evil arriving without a sympathetic backstory.
What to watch for
The series hasn't yet had to face its full audience; the debate so far runs on early word. The real test comes when general viewers — not Steinbeck readers, not critics — meet this Cathy cold. If they find her human, Kazan and Pugh's reading wins the screen. The book, as always, keeps its own.
Source: NYT Arts
More from Grace Kim
Show full bio
Correspondent covering technology and product news in arts in the broadest sense at Arts & Voices.
621 articles



