Neil Young Sues Trump Fundraising Committee for $10 Million
Neil Young filed a $10 million suit over 'Rockin' in the Free World' at Trump's Ohio rally, citing an alleged 2020 settlement barring use of his music.

Programme
- Neil Young filed a $10 million lawsuit on Monday over his song played at Trump's October 12 rally in Youngstown, Ohio
- The complaint cites a prior lawsuit and a 2020 settlement in which Trump allegedly agreed never to use Young's music without permission
- Young, 80, first objected to Trump's use of the 1989 song in 2015 and again in 2018
- Trump is not named as an individual defendant; the suit targets the Trump 47 Committee in federal court in Virginia
- Artists including the White Stripes, Rihanna and Pharrell Williams have previously objected to Trump's use of their songs
Neil Young filed a $10 million lawsuit against a Trump fundraising committee on Monday over the unauthorized use of "Rockin' in the Free World" at an October 12 rally in Youngstown, Ohio.
The five-page complaint, obtained by Rolling Stone, was filed in federal court in Virginia, where the Trump 47 Committee is based. Trump himself is not named as an individual defendant.
What does the suit allege?
According to the filing, Trump was "personally aware that a license would be required" to play the song at an event, and he also knew Young "has not and would not grant the required license."
The stakes are higher than a one-off play at a rally. The complaint states the unauthorized use happened despite a prior lawsuit and a 2020 settlement in which Trump allegedly agreed never to use Young's music without permission. If that settlement is confirmed in court, the committee's exposure could extend well beyond a routine licensing dispute.
Young's lawyers, Robert Besser and Scott Simmons, argue the song's meaning is at the heart of the case. "'Rockin' in the Free World' is a blistering anthem that contrasts the hollow promises of American political rhetoric with the harsh realities faced by the poor, homeless, and forgotten," they wrote in the complaint.
"The lyrics paint vivid street-level portraits of a mother discarding her baby, addicts lost in despair, garbage piling in the shadows of prosperity, while the repeated chorus delivers a savage irony, celebrating freedom that clearly isn't shared by all."
The filing adds that the 1989 song — named Rolling Stone's best vintage rock song of 2026 — "is the opposite of everything that Donald J. Trump stands for."
A decade of objections
Young, 80, has fought this fight before, and the record shows a pattern.
- 2015: Trump used the track at his Trump Tower campaign announcement. A Young spokesperson said at the time: "Donald Trump was not authorized to use 'Rockin' in the Free World' in his presidential candidacy announcement. Neil Young, a Canadian citizen, is a supporter of Bernie Sanders for President of the United States of America."
- 2018: Trump played the song again. Young objected again, writing on his website: "I asked him then, in a widely shared, public letter to cease and desist." He added: "However, he chose not to listen to my request, just as he chooses not to listen to the many American voices who ask him to stop his constant lies, to stop his petty, nasty name-calling, and bullying, to stop pushing his dangerous, vilifying and hateful rhetoric."
- 2020: The parties reached a settlement, which the new complaint says included a promise not to use Young's music without permission.
There was no immediate answer to a request for comment sent to the White House, the Trump 47 Committee, and the Republican National Committee, which partnered with Trump to create the joint fundraising committee.
What does this change for artists?
Young is not alone. The White Stripes, Rihanna, Axl Rose, Pharrell Williams, Linkin Park, and the estates of Tom Petty and Sinéad O'Connor have all publicly objected to Trump's use of their songs. Most of those disputes ended in objections and cease-and-desist letters rather than damages claims.
Young's suit, backed by an alleged 2020 settlement and a specific dollar figure, tests whether such objections carry financial consequences — or whether campaigns can keep treating artist objections as background noise.
Source: Rolling Stone Music
More from Tom Whitfield
Show full bio
Market editor covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in arts in the broadest sense at Arts & Voices.
928 articles


