Programme
- The REMEL report estimates barriers to Black and south Asian music events cost London £127m–£141m a year.
- Projected losses exceed £650m over five years.
- The report follows a two-year investigation led by Black Lives in Music.
- Many genres are labelled 'high risk' despite a lack of evidence, the investigation found.
Racial inequality in London's live music industry costs the capital up to £141 million a year, according to the Race Equality in Music Event Licensing (REMEL) report. The figure covers cancellations, displacement and events prevented from taking place altogether. Over five years, projected losses exceed £650 million — roughly the annual budget of a mid-sized London borough spent twice over.
The report, led by the organisation Black Lives in Music, follows a two-year investigation. Its central finding is stark: Black and south Asian music events in London face disproportionate cancellations, restrictions and licensing barriers compared with white events.
What did the investigation find?
REMEL documents three main patterns of disadvantage:
- disproportionate cancellations of Black and south Asian events
- restrictions imposed on those events once licensed
- licensing barriers that stop some events from taking place at all
The investigation also found that many genres associated with these communities are labelled "high risk" by licensing authorities. The report states this designation persists despite a lack of evidence supporting it.
The £127m to £141m annual estimate translates to more than £1 million lost every three days. The five-year projection of £650m-plus gives the finding a scale policymakers cannot easily dismiss.
The takeaway: the barriers are systemic, not incidental, and they carry a measurable economic price.
Why the "high risk" label matters
The report's most consequential claim concerns risk assessment. Genres tied to Black and south Asian audiences are routinely classified as high risk. The investigation found no evidentiary basis for that classification.
That label has concrete consequences. It can trigger stricter licensing conditions, higher costs for promoters and, ultimately, cancellations. Each cancellation removes revenue from venues, artists and the wider London economy — the mechanism behind the report's nine-figure annual loss estimate.
The takeaway: an unevidenced risk label functions as an economic gatekeeper for entire communities of promoters and performers.
What is at stake for London?
Black Lives in Music led the two-year investigation, which examined racial inequality across the capital's live music licensing system. The organisation frames the problem as both a cultural and an economic one.
The numbers anchor that argument. A £127m–£141m annual loss rivals the revenue of a major festival sector in its own right. The £650m five-year projection assumes no reform.
Whether the Greater London licensing authorities respond with changes to risk-assessment practice will determine whether that projection holds. The report gives them both the evidence and the financial case to act.
Source: Guardian Music
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering technology and product news in arts in the broadest sense at Arts & Voices.
512 articles

