On viewArchitecture & Design

Democrats Win House and Senate; Trump Promotes His $400 Million White House Ballroom

Democrats took the House and Senate on Tuesday. On Wednesday, Trump marked the final beam on his $400 million White House ballroom, calling it "a special structure."

After a Democratic Victory in Midterm Elections, Trump Focuses on Touting His Ballroom: ‘This Is a Special Structure’
After a Democratic Victory in Midterm Elections, Trump Focuses on Touting His Ballroom: ‘This Is a Special Structure’Josh / unsplash

Programme

  1. Democrats won control of both the House and Senate in Tuesday's midterm elections.
  2. Trump's ballroom plan carries a $400 million price tag and required demolishing the White House East Wing.
  3. In September, the Supreme Court allowed construction to proceed, ruling the National Trust for Historic Preservation lacked standing.
  4. On Wednesday, Trump called the project "a special structure" at a beam-raising ceremony.

Democrats took control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate in Tuesday's midterm elections. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump did not dwell on the results. Instead, he appeared at a ceremony marking the raising of the final beam on his $400 million White House ballroom.

"This is a special structure," Trump said, according to the New York Times. "It's going to be not only one of the biggest, but it'll be the most beautiful ballroom, I think, anywhere in the world."

Why the ballroom is controversial

The project has drawn criticism from the start, for reasons that go well beyond its price tag. To make room for it, the White House's East Wing was demolished. Trump has also said the structure will include a military complex beneath it.

Past presidents and US courts have both challenged whether Trump has the authority to undertake such a project at all. The president has largely stuck to his guns, once labeling the ballroom "THE GREATEST OF ITS KIND!" in one of his trademark emphatic pronouncements.

What does the Supreme Court ruling actually change?

Here's the mechanism, in plain terms. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a preservation advocacy group, filed a lawsuit aiming to halt the ballroom's construction. In September, the Supreme Court ruled that construction could go forward — but not because the court endorsed the project. It simply found that the National Trust lacked the legal grounds, or standing (the requirement that a plaintiff show a concrete injury), to bring the suit in the first place.

That distinction matters now more than ever. With Democrats controlling both chambers of Congress from January, Trump's ability to fully proceed with the plan remains an open question. Congress controls spending, and a $400 million project on the White House grounds gives the new majority plenty of leverage if it chooses to use it.

Trump's own defense of the project

The president has faced repeated questions about why he keeps adding to or amending preexisting structures in Washington, D.C. He addressed the criticism directly on Wednesday.

"You know, it was sort of mentioned a little bit during the campaign: 'Why does Trump spend time on the White House?'" he said. "Well, first of all, it's very little time. Second of all, I like it. It's good. For me, it's relaxing."

The framing is telling. Trump casts the ballroom as a personal passion project rather than an official obligation — a hobby that happens to involve demolishing a historic wing of the executive mansion and building a military complex underneath it.

What comes next

The beam is up, the Supreme Court has cleared one legal obstacle, and the president sounds unbowed. But the midterm results change the political arithmetic around the $400 million plan. Whether a Democratic House and Senate move to scrutinize, delay, or defund the ballroom will be one of the first tests of the new Congress's appetite for confronting the president on his own turf — literally.

Original: nytimes.com

white-house, donald-trump, historic-preservation, ballroom-architecture, us-congress

Also on view

« Previous article