'Dirty Dancing' Sequel Won't Use AI to Revive Patrick Swayze, Producer Says
Producer Nina Jacobson says the '90s-set sequel will honor the late Patrick Swayze — and won't bring him back with AI. Jennifer Grey returns as Baby.

Programme
- Jennifer Grey returns as Frances "Baby" Houseman in a '90s-set Dirty Dancing sequel produced by Color Force for Lionsgate.
- Producer Nina Jacobson confirmed the sequel will not use AI to recreate Patrick Swayze, who died in 2009 of pancreatic cancer.
- The original Dirty Dancing was released in 1987; Color Force joined the sequel project earlier this year.
- A Crazy Rich Asians HBO series based on Kevin Kwan's books replaces the long-speculated sequel to the 2018 film.
- Jacobson spoke at IndieWire's Future of Filmmaking 2026 Summit in Los Angeles on Saturday.
By Tom Whitfield
Jennifer Grey will return as Frances "Baby" Houseman in a "Dirty Dancing" sequel set in the 1990s, and producer Nina Jacobson has made one commitment outright: Patrick Swayze will not be resurrected with artificial intelligence.
"That's one of the things that you really have to focus on: how to let people mourn him in a movie," Jacobson said during a panel at IndieWire's Future of Filmmaking 2026 Summit in Los Angeles on Saturday. Then she added an assurance: "And don't worry, we won't be bringing him back with AI."
Swayze, who played dancer Johnny Castle opposite Grey in the 1987 original, died in 2009 of pancreatic cancer. Jacobson says his legacy will shape the sequel rather than be digitally sidestepped.
What kind of sequel is this?
Not a glossy legacy retread, if Jacobson's account holds. Her production company Color Force joined the Lionsgate project earlier this year — a follow-up to the 1987 film, though not to 2004's "Havana Nights." The new story places Baby in a 1990s romance with a young cast around her.
Jacobson, whose Color Force is also behind FX's "Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. & Carolyn Bessette" and Lionsgate's upcoming "Hunger Games" prequel "Sunrise on the Reaping," argued the original has aged into something rawer than its reputation.
"I remember when I first saw it, it seemed like very glossy entertainment. Now it feels like kind of an indie. They take a lot of risks and they touch a lot of topics that people don't touch in movies anymore," she said in conversation with IndieWire editor-in-chief Brent Lang.
Her evidence: the film's abortion subplot. "If you tried to just slip by an abortion subplot in a romantic movie now, I think you'd get a lot of notes on that."
What does Grey bring to the writing?
Grey is not merely starring; Jacobson credits her as a creative partner in shaping Baby's next chapter.
"Grey has incredible insights into why she thinks ['Dirty Dancing'] has lasted so much or what it is about her character that spoke so much to people and still does," Jacobson said.
The producing principle, she said, borrows from adaptation: a film need not replicate its source, but it should reproduce its effect. "It should make you feel the way the book did, and it should feel the way the book felt. [We are] trying to chase the feeling of that original movie." A young love story that takes comparable risks, she said, "felt like an incredible chance for us."
The caveat is obvious: "chasing a feeling" is a promise no script can verify in advance. Whether a '90s-set romance can carry the 1987 film's edge — class conflict, reproductive rights, a resort staffed by performers the guests exploit — will be decided on the page, not in a panel quote.
Why 'Crazy Rich Asians' went to HBO instead
Jacobson also addressed the newly announced HBO series based on Kevin Kwan's book series, which continues the story of the hit 2018 romantic comedy after years of speculation about a second film.
"We've struggled with trying to adapt it as a feature. It's actually very hard to do a sequel to a romantic comedy because you resolve the central emotional conflict," she said.
Two factors drove the pivot to television:
- The feature-side executives who made the original film are gone, and their successors "didn't necessarily have that appetite," while HBO showed "an enormous appetite" for the books.
- Kwan's novels contain "a great big cast of characters and all these crazy melodramatic twists and turns" that a film format forces studios to cut. "It's very well-suited to television."
A cast reunion, she argued, is now more plausible than it would have been in 2018. "It was unimaginable if we tried to do this right after the movie came out: the idea that you could get all of these people who all blew up afterwards to do a TV show together. But now everybody misses everybody else."
The wider summit
The IndieWire Future of Filmmaking 2026 Summit, presented by AT&T Untold Stories — a multi-year collaboration between AT&T and Tribeca Festival that awards $1.2 million, mentorship and support to emerging filmmakers — also featured a keynote by directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller on their sci-fi blockbuster "Project Hail Mary" and a one-on-one with Bill Hader on his upcoming feature debut, "They Know."
Neither the "Dirty Dancing" sequel nor the "Crazy Rich Asians" series has a release date. What the announcements change, for now, is the direction of two valuable properties: one betting that television can do what a rom-com sequel cannot, the other betting that a 38-year-old film's risk appetite — not its nostalgia — is the asset worth reviving.
Original: pmc.com
More from Tom Whitfield
Show full bio
Market editor covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in arts in the broadest sense at Arts & Voices.
634 articles



