Christopher Wheeldon's 'Oscar': Skillful Ballet, Timid Wilde
Christopher Wheeldon's "Oscar," performed by the Australian Ballet, is "constructed with skill but is disappointingly timid," a new review finds — a Wilde "in love but drained of wit."

Programme
- Christopher Wheeldon choreographed "Oscar," performed by the Australian Ballet.
- The review's headline calls the work "A Dancing Oscar Wilde, in Love but Drained of Wit."
- The reviewer's verdict: "constructed with skill but is disappointingly timid."
- The ballet centers Wilde in love but, per the review, loses his wit.
Christopher Wheeldon's "Oscar," performed by the Australian Ballet, is "constructed with skill but is disappointingly timid," according to a new review titled "A Dancing Oscar Wilde, in Love but Drained of Wit."
The verdict lands on one of the most prominent names in international choreography. Wheeldon, the creator of "Oscar," built the ballet around Oscar Wilde — a writer defined by language, paradox and wit — and placed him in love.
What does the review actually say?
The review makes two claims, and both matter for anyone tracking Wheeldon's career or the Australian Ballet's programming.
-
Craft is not in question. The reviewer states plainly that "Oscar" is "constructed with skill." Wheeldon's handling of structure and stagecraft receives no objection.
-
Boldness is. The work is "disappointingly timid" — a pointed word choice for a ballet about a figure who was anything but.
The headline completes the judgment: this is "A Dancing Oscar Wilde, in Love but Drained of Wit." The phrase "drained of wit" cuts hardest. Wilde without wit is Wilde without his sharpest instrument, and the review suggests the ballet leaves that instrument on the table.
Why the verdict carries weight
The pairing of subject and choreographer made "Oscar" a natural draw. Wilde's life — the love, the trials, the ruin — offers a choreographer large, legible material. A love-driven narrative is a conventional operatic and balletic frame, and by the review's account Wheeldon used it.
Yet the review's double judgment — skillful, timid — identifies a familiar risk in narrative ballet: technical polish without dramatic risk. A Wilde ballet that plays it safe contradicts its subject at the level of temperament. The reviewer's word "timid" is precisely the charge Wilde himself would have laughed at.
"In love but drained of wit" also implies a trade-off. The production chose romance and lost the irony. For a writer whose genius lived in inversion — the joke that tells the truth — the exchange reads as a net loss.
What it means for the run
The Australian Ballet now carries a mixed critical banner into the remainder of the run: admiration for construction, reservation about courage. Audiences deciding whether to book will weigh Wheeldon's proven craftsmanship against the review's warning that the work softens the very quality — wit — that made Wilde Wilde.
For Wheeldon, the review sets a marker: the next full-length narrative work will be measured against the charge of timidity, and against the standard of verbal daring his chosen subject embodied.
Source: NYT Arts
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering media and advertising at Arts & Voices.
369 articles


