On viewMusic

She’s Alive LLC drops lawsuit against Dolly Parton’s nephew

She’s Alive LLC dismissed a September lawsuit against Bryan Seaver after court papers described threats against Dolly Parton’s estate and a judge restricted his access to properties.

Dolly Parton’s Manager Drops Lawsuit Against Singer’s Nephew
Dolly Parton’s Manager Drops Lawsuit Against Singer’s NephewQuinceCreative / pixabay

Programme

  1. On Thursday, She’s Alive LLC voluntarily dismissed its Nashville lawsuit against Bryan Seaver.
  2. The September lawsuit accused Seaver of a “campaign of threats” and seeking money from Parton’s estate.
  3. A judge granted one temporary restraining order barring Seaver from Parton’s properties.
  4. In August, Seaver appeared on Parton’s social media accounts to announce her death.
  5. Parton died in late August after a brief cancer battle, according to representatives.

By Elena Vasquez

She’s Alive LLC voluntarily dismissed its Nashville lawsuit against Dolly Parton’s nephew Bryan Seaver on Thursday, ending a September case over alleged threats and attempts to obtain money from Parton’s estate.

A notice filed Thursday with a state court in Nashville said the company, which manages Parton’s affairs after her death, dismissed the suit voluntarily. She’s Alive LLC is run by Parton’s longtime manager, Danny Nozell. Representatives for both sides did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the circumstances.

The suit, filed in September, named Seaver, Parton’s nephew and bodyguard, who ran a security company overseeing some of her properties. Seaver had appeared on Parton’s social media accounts in August to announce her death.

The lawsuit alleged that Seaver used threats to extract money from his aunt’s estate.

What did the lawsuit allege?

The September filing accused Seaver of waging a “campaign of threats” to extract money from his aunt’s estate. It relied on a series of text messages he sent to Nozell, which the court papers said alarmed Nozell and his associates.

Seaver described himself as an “international arms dealer and mercenary.” The filing placed that self-description alongside messages in which he threatened to start a podcast about his grievances and “ruining Dolly’s brand partnerships.”

In the messages, using an expletive, Seaver said he would “spend the next time I have on earth” ruining “anyone that has ever betrayed my family.” The complaint used the messages to support its allegation that Seaver sought estate money.

In plain terms, the suit claimed that Seaver used threats to seek money from the estate.

Why did a judge bar Seaver from her properties?

Based on the court papers, a judge granted a temporary restraining order that barred Seaver from Parton’s properties. The published account gave no claimed dollar amount, order end date or final liability finding for the temporary measure.

Seaver vehemently denied threatening or intimidating anyone. He accused Nozell of distorting innocuous interactions to discredit him. Seaver also denied that he had demanded money from the estate. He said he was seeking payments owed to his security company.

His response placed the meaning of the messages directly at issue. Nozell’s company characterized them as a threatening campaign for money, while Seaver characterized the exchanges as business dealings over unpaid work.

The temporary order rested on the court papers; Seaver said the messages did not support the lawsuit’s claim.

What remains unresolved after the dismissal?

The Thursday notice ended the lawsuit. It did not answer why She’s Alive LLC chose to dismiss, and neither side’s representatives supplied an explanation. The published account also left the restraining order’s status after dismissal unstated.

Parton died in late August after a brief battle with cancer, according to her representatives. The published account described her business empire as including:

  • Dollywood, the amusement park.
  • A new hotel and museum.
  • An array of branded products.

The dismissal closes the case, not the dispute over alleged threats, property access and payment for Seaver’s security work. A later court filing or public explanation from either side could clarify why the company withdrew, whether the temporary order remains in force, and whether the estate-payment dispute continues.

Source: NYT Arts

dolly-parton, bryan-seaver, shes-alive-llc, estate-dispute, lawsuit

Also on view

« Previous articleNext article »